Pakistan has firmly rejected the unfounded allegations, circulating in certain segments of the Indian media, which falsely claim that Pakistan employed the Shaheen missile during "Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos". 

Responding to Indian media's baseless claims regarding use of Shaheen Missile in "Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos, Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Shafqat Ali Khan said these claims originated following the release of a video by the Indian Army's official Twitter handle, purportedly showing the use of Pakistan's Shaheen missile.

He said upon realizing that the claim was unsubstantiated, the Indian Army promptly deleted the misleading video. However, by then, sections of the Indian media had already amplified the false narrative without verification. Regrettably, some Indian outlets continue to propagate this misinformation. 

It is noteworthy that the Indian Army's official handle remained silent on the matter, offering neither clarification nor retraction for the erroneous post. 

Analysts observe that such disinformation campaigns are part of a deliberate attempt to obscure India's setbacks in Operation Sindoor, which were a result of Pakistan's demonstrated conventional military capabilities.

Additionally, these fabricated stories align with New Delhi's ongoing efforts to promote a misleading narrative regarding the ceasefire and baseless allegations of so-called "nuclear blackmail" by Pakistan. 

The Spokesperson said the range of weapons used by Pakistan is detailed in the ISPR press release dated 12 May.

The Pakistan Armed Forces employed precision-guided, long-range Fatah series missiles -F1 and F2 - as well as advanced munitions, highly capable long-range loitering killer drones, and precision long-range artillery.

The military sites in India and in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir targeted by these assets are also listed in the ISPR press release of 12th of this month.

The Foreign Office Spokesperson said disseminating unverified and inflammatory content not only undermines regional stability but also reflects poorly on the professionalism of official institutions.